Scott Tomko


 Role: Individual Sponsor Posts: 214 Private Message 
 |
| 09-17-2009 10:17 PM |
|
How necessary are UV filters? Are they do or die? or just a gadget?
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Tomko


 Role: Individual Sponsor Posts: 214 Private Message 
 |
| 09-25-2009 09:31 AM |
|
Looks like they are very important in systems housing lots of fish. |
|
|
|
|
Steven Pro


 Role: Individual Sponsor Pittsburgh, PA Posts: 985 Private Message 
 |
| 11-06-2009 02:34 PM |
|
There are times I would definitely use a UV and other times I think they are a waste. It depends on the application. What are you doing? |
|
|
|
|
Scott Tomko


 Role: Individual Sponsor Posts: 214 Private Message 
 |
| 11-12-2009 09:50 PM |
|
I'm breeding clowns right now, hopefully a bunch of different fish soon. |
|
|
|
|
Steven Pro


 Role: Individual Sponsor Pittsburgh, PA Posts: 985 Private Message 
 |
| 01-28-2010 12:49 PM |
|
If you are looking to sterilize water that is flowing between a multitude of aquariums on a central system, large commercial UV's are a good idea. |
|
|
|
|
Matt Pedersen
 Role: Duluth, MN Posts: 61 Private Message 
 |
| 02-03-2010 02:53 PM |
|
I'm fully inclined to agree with Mr. Pro. The fact is that in breeding setups, we the ratio of fish to water is such that when one fish gets sick, they all could. All the normal things that prevent disease, be it immune response, water quality, natural 'removal', you name it, is at a disadvantage when you cram that many fish in one space. Think about it this way. If you're in a gymnasium with one other person who has a cold, how likely are you to catch that cold. Now fill that same space with 200 other people. How much more likely are you, and everyone else, to catch that cold? I would say that in a breeding setup, UV is not-optional in my opinion. The age old "ounce of prevention vs. pound of cure" argument definitely applies. |
|
| "You only need to raise one..." |
|
|